The Spine

Opinion Page

Submit your rebuttals to us at: spine_prick@yahoo.com




We Don't Need No Stinking Work Orders!

This Guest Editorial by 'Fool on the Hill' was first posted on the BisbeeForum on 4/30/06:

Title: Bisbee Public Works - We Don't Need No Stinking Work Orders!

So the latest story, according to the Observer, is that Public Works has undifferentiated HURF dollars that they spend of paving projects. No mention of plans, priorities, or any kind of council oversight or direction - might that be because there isn't any???

Hey, just take a ride around and see if you can divine exactly what motivates the recent paving projects you find. A filled pothole? How in hell does anyone pick which ones to tackle from our collection (Bisbee = biggest and baddest potholes West of Albert Hall)? According to past press releases, citizens merely need to pick up the phone and call in their favorite pothole to Public Works. Really - is it first squawked, first served?

Here in Warren, alleys get paved while downright hazardous streets like the hill on Minder going up over the ridge from Black Knob to Yuma Trail gets ignored. That's what Peter [von Gundlach]'s squawking about, and good on him for hanging in there! If there is a PW plan for what gets paved and when, it's been cleverly concealed. Why Council can't set goals and policy directives for the use of HURF money is the question at hand, followed closely by the question of what responsibility Russ McConnell has for the mess on Minder Street?

And let's not ignore the poor quality of paving done by City crews on these paving jobs. Most of what I've seen looks like a waste of perfectly good asphalt - NO proper removal of damaged pavement, NO adequate base repair or preparation, NO proper grading or compaction of the new asphalt. Hell, grass is already growing through much of the asphalt laid in Warren over the past 6 months! Might it not be more efficient to just simply burn our HURF dollars and spare the City the wasted labor expense of pretending to patch or repave streets?

Peter is working up a petition asking the City to comply with the Charter and fill the mandated position of City Engineer with a qualified and currently licensed civil engineer. If we had one, it's hard to imagine he or she would tolerate the extremely poor quality of current PW paving work. You say we can't afford one? I say we can't afford NOT to have one. If you think the City has no plan for or little expertise in street paving, just think how we are not dealing with the problem of failing terraces. Talk about a shoe waiting to drop! One of these days the rains will return to fall on Bisbee, and when they do expect more terrace walls to fall with them.

Russ McConnell can summon all sorts of arguments and reasons why private property owners need to act and why the City has/is/will do everything they can, but can't fix everything that's wrong. Setting aside the basic fact that Russ can't tell you about any terrace condition monitoring and repair master plan BECAUSE THERE ISN'T ANY, the City is has a growing liability for predictable (and in some cases, imminent) catastrophic terrace failures. When the crumbling terrace supporting the water tank above High Road goes, someone's going to get hurt or quite possibly killed, and the AZ League of City and Towns will toss Bisbee out of the insurance pool for being so obstinate and stupid as to ignore imminent peril and sink the pool with hideous and completely avoidable claims. And when Bisbee has to pay premium rates for marginal liability coverage because of our rotten and incredibly stupid claim history, a City Engineer will seem cheap!

The thing that gets me riled is that no one on Council or in the city administration shows any leadership at all on these larger infrastructure issues, let alone the Minder Ave attempted boondoggle (which sorry, does indeed look like a hand-in-the-cookie-jar moment). And apparently, Russ must be bulletproof, as he is obviously stonewalling Pauken's inquiry and getting away with it. 







Big Brother sets back the clock to 1984
Zoning code revisions only a gated community could love.

June 15, 2006  Planning & Zoning Agenda
Item 1. Discussion and Possible Recommendation to the City Council Regarding Proposed Revisions to the City Zoning Code Section 6.8, Outdoor Storage, 6.9 Abandoned or Junk Vehicles and Definitions 9.2 Abandoned Vehicles, Junk, and Junk Vehicles.
            - John Charley, Community Development director

The Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday, June 15, will include a public hearing on Agenda Item #1. It is quite likely that a recommendation will be made to Council at this meeting for this Agenda Item.


If you, too, question why we need harsher rules and regulations which will turn this community into just the sort of town which most of us thought to avoid when we came here, then the June 15 P&Z meeting may be your last chance to have your concerns heard before this measure goes to Council. I continue to ask, "Do we really want to follow the path of Santa Fe or Sedona, where we allow developers to destroy the Bisbee we know and love just for the sake of a buck?"

These harsher rules and regulations being proposed will go a long way to eliminating the property owner's ability to do what he likes on with his own property. Forcing such "one rule fits all" regulations on this town will also pose an undue hardship on the poorer residents and neighborhoods in town.


These harsher rules and regulations being proposed will also increase the likelihood of the selective enforcement that Bisbee has seen so much of. Shouldn't we uniformly enforce the rules and regulations now on the books before we bring in stiffer and unduly subjective rules and regulations which will make it all the harder for just one officer to enforce uniformly?

If someone is so very bothered about what is stored in his neighbor's yard, it is his right to put up a privacy fence. It should not be his right to force his neighbor to live up to his own (neurotic?) standards of what is neat, tidy, and ordered ... at least not in Bisbee!

As Bob Kasun has said (when the chicken herders were being persecuted by the City), we fought a war so that we could have the freedom to do what we want with our own back yards
." 
[Click here for the proposed revisions in O-06-23  (PDF File)]

[Click here for the proposed revisions in O-06-20  (PDF File)]

The text which is lined though is existing wording which will be deleted. The text which is underlined is proposed wording which will be added.

Back to Top

The Confusing Truth about Lying
(The Paradox of the Liar)
The Federal Government has no problem prosecuting liars, but is Bisbee special? Or is it because there are truths that are truths, truths that are lies, and lies that are truths just as there are those in Bisbee who claim that they never lie and those who claim that they always lie?  Is truth that important in government? The Feds say yes, Bisbee says no. In Bisbee does it seem that there are those folks in power who prefer to believe that they must lie in order to tell you the truth in order to protect you (and themselves) from their lies? Why not establish a Bisbee Liar's day in which the best lie by the highest ranking city official be rewarded with a dinner at La Roka and a free night stay at Copper City Inn? Creativity should be encouraged be it lying or tagging; isn't that what Bisbee is all about?
(Click here: Washington Post -- Ex Bush Aide who lied Found Guilty)

(Click here: Paukens Response to 'Minder Paving Event' Petition, Page 1)

(Click here: 
Paukens Response to 'Minder Paving Event' Petition, Page 2)

(Click here: Jeff Schwarz quoted in "The Bisbee Observer")

(Click here: "Photos of the "anectodal" 'Minder Paving Event')

Back to Top



Back to Top

Back to Home


Copyright © 2006 by Galleco. All rights reserved. ~ Revised: May 12, 2008